On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 10:00 AM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 9:16 AM Roger Sayle <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This patch is an alternate/supplementary fix to PR tree-optimization/105668
> > that provides a vcond_mask_v1titi optab/define_expand to the i386 backend.
> > An undocumented feature/bug of GCC's vectorization is that any target that
> > provides a vec_cmpeq<mode><mode> has to also provide a matching
> > vcond_mask<mode><mode>.  This backend patch preserves the status quo,
> > rather than fixes the underlying problem.
>
> IIRC, I also hit this issue a while ago. I was under impression it was
> fixed in the meantime, but looks I was wrong.
>
> > One aspect of this clean-up is that ix86_expand_sse_movcc provides
> > fallback implementations using pand/pandn/por that effectively make
> > V2DImode and V1TImode vcond_mask available on any TARGET_SSE2, not
> > just TARGET_SSE4_2.  This allows a simplification as V2DI mode can
> > be handled by using a VI_128 mode iterator instead of a VI124_128
> > mode iterator, and instead this define_expand is effectively renamed
> > to provide a V1TImode vcond_mask expander (as V1TI isn't in VI_128).
> >
> > This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> > and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32} with
> > no new failures.  The new test case is identical to the middle-end patch,
> > so if both patches are approved, this'll be committed only once.
> > Ok for mainline?
>
> OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.
>
> >
> >
> > 2022-05-23  Roger Sayle  <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com>
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog
> >         PR tree-optimization/105668
> >         * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_sse_movcc): Support
> >         V1TImode, just like V2DImode.
> >         * config/i386/sse.md (vcond_mask_<mode>Msseintvecmodelower>):
> >         Use VI_128 mode iterator instead of VI124_128 to include V2DI.
> >         (vcond_mask_v2div2di): Delete.
> >         (vcond_mask_v1tiv1ti): New define_expand.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >         PR tree-optimization/105668
> >         * gcc.target/i386/pr105668.c: New test case.


diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105668.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105668.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..359c2b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105668.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */

Please use { target int128 } here.

+/* { dg-options "-O -ftracer -fno-tree-fre" } */
+
+typedef __int128 __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;

> >
> > Roger
> > --
> >

Reply via email to