I have reverted the patch to fix PR105624.

Uros.

On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 10:10 PM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> const_int_operand and other const*_operand predicates do not need
> constraints when the constraint is inherited from the range of
> constant integer predicate.  Remove the constraint in case all
> alternatives use the same inherited constraint.
>
> 2022-05-15  Uroš Bizjak  <ubiz...@gmail.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>     * config/i386/i386.md: Remove constraints when used with
>     const_int_operand, const0_operand, const_1_operand, constm1_operand,
>     const8_operand, const128_operand, const248_operand, const123_operand,
>     const2367_operand, const1248_operand, const359_operand,
>     const_4_or_8_to_11_operand, const48_operand, const_0_to_1_operand,
>     const_0_to_3_operand, const_0_to_4_operand, const_0_to_5_operand,
>     const_0_to_7_operand, const_0_to_15_operand, const_0_to_31_operand,
>     const_0_to_63_operand, const_0_to_127_operand, const_0_to_255_operand,
>     const_0_to_255_mul_8_operand, const_1_to_31_operand,
>     const_1_to_63_operand, const_2_to_3_operand, const_4_to_5_operand,
>     const_4_to_7_operand, const_6_to_7_operand, const_8_to_9_operand,
>     const_8_to_11_operand, const_8_to_15_operand, const_10_to_11_operand,
>     const_12_to_13_operand, const_12_to_15_operand, const_14_to_15_operand,
>     const_16_to_19_operand, const_16_to_31_operand, const_20_to_23_operand,
>     const_24_to_27_operand and const_28_to_31_operand.
>     * config/i386/mmx.md: Ditto.
>     * config/i386/sse.md: Ditto.
>     * config/i386/subst.md: Ditto.
>     * config/i386/sync.md: Ditto.
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
>
> Pushed to master.
>
> Uros.

Reply via email to