More precisely, untagged record types, as tagged record types are already
handled by the predicate. If the derived type has not been given its own
representation clause, then the representations are the same.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
gcc/ada/
* sem_ch13.adb (Has_Compatible_Representation): Return true for
derived untagged record types without representation clause.
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
@@ -13539,6 +13539,16 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
if Is_Packed (T1) /= Is_Packed (T2) then
return False;
+ -- If the operand type is derived from the target type and no clause
+ -- has been given after the derivation, then the representations are
+ -- the same since the derived type inherits that of the parent type.
+
+ elsif Is_Derived_Type (T2)
+ and then Etype (T2) = T1
+ and then not Has_Record_Rep_Clause (T2)
+ then
+ return True;
+
-- Otherwise we must check components. Typ2 maybe a constrained
-- subtype with fewer components, so we compare the components
-- of the base types.