thanks.
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:09 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> When looking around the spot of the PR105591 fix, I've noticed a typo
> and incorrectly formatted comment.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i668-linux, committed to
> trunk as obvious.
>
> 2022-05-17 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> * tree-ssa-forwprop.cc (simplify_bitfield_ref): Spelling fix:
> hanlde -> handle. Fix up comment formatting.
>
> --- gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc.jj 2022-05-13 09:34:24.027146889 +0200
> +++ gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc 2022-05-16 11:54:06.704257100 +0200
> @@ -2356,14 +2356,14 @@ simplify_bitfield_ref (gimple_stmt_itera
> code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt);
> elem_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> type = TREE_TYPE (op);
> - /* Also hanlde vector type.
> - .i.e.
> - _7 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <_1, _1, { 2, 3, 2, 3 }>;
> - _11 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_7, 64, 0>;
> + /* Also handle vector type.
> + .i.e.
> + _7 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <_1, _1, { 2, 3, 2, 3 }>;
> + _11 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_7, 64, 0>;
>
> - to
> + to
>
> - _11 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_1, 64, 64>. */
> + _11 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_1, 64, 64>. */
>
> size = tree_to_poly_uint64 (TYPE_SIZE (type));
> if (maybe_ne (bit_field_size (op), size))
>
> Jakub
>
--
BR,
Hongtao
