[PATCH] [i386] Fix ICE caused by wrong condition.

[liuhongt via Gcc-patches]

When d->perm[i] == d->perm[i-1] + 1 and d->perm[i] == nelt, it's not
continuous. It should fail if there's more than 2 continuous areas.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
Ok for trunk?


gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR target/105587
        * config/i386/i386-expand.cc
        (expand_vec_perm_pslldq_psrldq_por): Fail when (d->perm[i] ==
        d->perm[i-1] + 1) && d->perm[i] == nelt && start != -1.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/i386/pr105587.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc           |  9 ++-------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105587.c | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105587.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
index 0fd3028c205..806e1f5aaa3 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
@@ -20963,7 +20963,8 @@ expand_vec_perm_pslldq_psrldq_por (struct 
expand_vec_perm_d *d, bool pandn)
   start1 = d->perm[0];
   for (i = 1; i < nelt; i++)
     {
-      if (d->perm[i] != d->perm[i-1] + 1)
+      if (d->perm[i] != d->perm[i-1] + 1
+         || d->perm[i] == nelt)
        {
          if (start2 == -1)
            {
@@ -20973,12 +20974,6 @@ expand_vec_perm_pslldq_psrldq_por (struct 
expand_vec_perm_d *d, bool pandn)
          else
            return false;
        }
-      else if (d->perm[i] >= nelt
-              && start2 == -1)
-       {
-         start2 = d->perm[i];
-         end1 = d->perm[i-1];
-       }
     }
 
   clear_op0 = end1 != nelt - 1;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105587.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105587.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a5b6ab2a016
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105587.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+#/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -msse2 -mno-ssse3" } */
+
+extern short arr_108[][4][2][24][12], arr_110[][4][2][24][12];
+void test() {
+  for (unsigned a = 0; a < 2; a += 2)
+    for (unsigned b = 4; b < 22; b++)
+      for (int c = 1; c < 11; c++)
+        arr_110[0][0][a][b][c] = (unsigned char)arr_108[0][0][a][b][c];
+}
+
-- 
2.18.1