Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> This test is executed in both C and C++ modes, lines 98 and 100 pass
> in C++ and are xfail in C.
>
> This results in similar lines in gcc.sum and g++.sum, differing by the
> PASS or XFAIL prefix, which confuses compare_test: it reports these
> tests twice, as "now fail, but worked before" and "now work, but
> didn't before". To make the diagnostic different betweek C and C++, I
> use $tool in the dg-error comment field.
>
> 2022-05-06 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@arm.com>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c: Make
> diagnostic unique.
OK, thanks.
Richard
> ---
> .../gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c
> index 621666ce6c9..95be60591fb 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/attributes_7.c
> @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ f (int c)
> fb = sb;
>
> (void) (c ? sb : sb);
> - (void) (c ? sb : fb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types} "" {
> xfail c } }
> + (void) (c ? sb : fb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types}
> "$tool" { xfail c } }
>
> - (void) (c ? fb : sb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types} "" {
> xfail c } }
> + (void) (c ? fb : sb); // { dg-error {type mismatch|different types}
> "$tool" { xfail c } }
> (void) (c ? fb : fb);
> }
