On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:59:05PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > If we cannot get this in soonish, maybe we can at least get approval for
> > applying Mike's simpler patch to the release branches, specifically GCC 10?
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059#c31
>
> Just an unconditional
>
> callee_isa &= ~OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION;
> explicit_isa &= ~OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION;
>
> will do, no? That is fine since these options should never have been
> used to determine if anything can be inlined, in the first place.
>
> A patch like that is pre-approved, even for trunk.
And as I said, logically we should do the same for p10 fusion. I.e.
callee_isa &= ~(OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION
| OPTION_MASK_P10_FUSION);
explicit_isa &= ~(OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION
| OPTION_MASK_P10_FUSION);
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com
