On 5/5/22 16:57, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:29:46PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/4/22 19:20, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 05:44:45PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/4/22 16:03, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch fixes the second half of 64679.  Here we issue a wrong
"redefinition of 'int x'" for the following:

     struct Bar {
       Bar(int, int, int);
     };

     int x = 1;
     Bar bar(int(x), int(x), int{x}); // #1

cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list does pushdecl every time it sees
a named parameter, so the second "int(x)" causes the error.  That's
premature, since this turns out to be a constructor call after the
third argument!

If the first parameter is parenthesized, we can't push until we've
established we're looking at a function declaration.  Therefore this
could be fixed by some kind of lookahead.  I thought about introducing
a lightweight variant of cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list that would
not have any side effects and would return as soon as it figures out
whether it's looking at a declaration or expression.  Since that would
require fairly nontrivial changes, I wanted something simpler.  Something
like delaying the pushdecl until we've reached the ')' following the
parameter-declaration-clause.  But that doesn't quite cut it: we must
have pushed the parameters before processing a default argument, as in:

     Bar bar(int(a), int(b), int c = sizeof(a));  // valid

I wondered how this would affect

    void f(int (i), decltype(i) j = 42);

interestingly, clang and EDG both reject this, but they accept

    void f(int (i), bool b = true, decltype(i) j = 42);

which suggests a similar implementation strategy.  MSVC accepts both.

Sigh, C++.

So the former would be rejected with this patch because decltype(i)
is parsed as the declspec.  And I can't play any cute games with decltype
because a decltype doesn't necessarily mean a parameter:

struct F {
    F(int, int);
};

void
g ()
{
    int x = 42;

    F v1(int(x), decltype(x)(42));

    F f1(int(i), decltype(i) j = 42);
    F f2(int(i), decltype(i) j);
    F f3(int(i), decltype(i)(j));
    F f4(int(i), decltype(i)(j) = 42);
    F f5(int (i), bool b = true, decltype(i) j = 42);
    F f6(int(i), decltype(x)(x));
}


But I think there's a way out: we could pushdecl the parameters as we
go and only stash when there would be a clash, if parsing tentatively.
And then push the pending parameters only at the end of the clause, solely
to get the redefinition/redeclaration error.  That is:

    Bar b(int(x), int(x), int{x});

would mean:
push x
store x
it's not a decl -> discard it, parse as an expression

    Bar b(int(x), int(x), int);

would mean:
push x
store x
it's a decl -> push pending parameters -> error

And then I don't need to push when about to commit, avoiding the need to
change cp_parser_parameter_declaration.  WDYT?

Sounds good to me.

Thanks!  Here's that approach in a patch form:

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

OK, thanks.

-- >8 --
This patch fixes the second half of 64679.  Here we issue a wrong
"redefinition of 'int x'" for the following:

   struct Bar {
     Bar(int, int, int);
   };

   int x = 1;
   Bar bar(int(x), int(x), int{x}); // #1

cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list does pushdecl every time it sees
a named parameter, so the second "int(x)" causes the error.  That's
premature, since this turns out to be a constructor call after the
third argument!

If the first parameter is parenthesized, we can't push until we've
established we're looking at a function declaration.  Therefore this
could be fixed by some kind of lookahead.  I thought about introducing a
lightweight variant of cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list that would
not have any side effects and would return as soon as it figures out
whether it's looking at a declaration or expression.  Since that would
require fairly nontrivial changes, I wanted something simpler.

Something like delaying the pushdecl until we've reached the ')'
following the parameter-declaration-clause.  But we must push the
parameters before processing a default argument, as in:

   Bar bar(int(a), int(b), int c = sizeof(a));  // valid

Moreover, this code should still be accepted

   Bar f(int(i), decltype(i) j = 42);

so this patch stashes parameters into a vector when parsing tentatively
only when pushdecl-ing a parameter would result in a clash and an error
about redefinition/redeclaration.  The stashed parameters are pushed at
the end of a parameter-declaration-clause if it's followed by a ')', so
that we still diagnose redefining a parameter.

        PR c++/64679

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * parser.cc (cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause): Maintain
        a vector of parameters that haven't been pushed yet.  Push them at the
        end of a valid parameter-declaration-clause.
        (cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list): Take a new auto_vec parameter.
        Do not pushdecl while parsing tentatively when pushdecl-ing a parameter
        would result in a hard error.
        (cp_parser_cache_defarg): Adjust the call to
        cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/parse/ambig11.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/parse/ambig12.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/parse/ambig13.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/parse/ambig14.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/parser.cc                     | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig11.C | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig12.C | 12 ++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig13.C | 32 ++++++++++++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig14.C | 21 ++++++++++
  5 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig11.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig12.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig13.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig14.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index b52cbe18b9a..3ebaa414a3d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -2391,7 +2391,7 @@ static void cp_parser_type_specifier_seq
  static tree cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause
    (cp_parser *, cp_parser_flags);
  static tree cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list
-  (cp_parser *, cp_parser_flags);
+  (cp_parser *, cp_parser_flags, auto_vec<tree> *);
  static cp_parameter_declarator *cp_parser_parameter_declaration
    (cp_parser *, cp_parser_flags, bool, bool *);
  static tree cp_parser_default_argument
@@ -24517,8 +24517,12 @@ cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause (cp_parser* 
parser,
        return explicit_void_list_node;
      }
+ /* A vector of parameters that haven't been pushed yet. */
+  auto_vec<tree> pending_decls;
+
    /* Parse the parameter-declaration-list.  */
-  parameters = cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list (parser, flags);
+  parameters = cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list (parser, flags,
+                                                    &pending_decls);
    /* If a parse error occurred while parsing the
       parameter-declaration-list, then the entire
       parameter-declaration-clause is erroneous.  */
@@ -24548,6 +24552,15 @@ cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause (cp_parser* 
parser,
    else
      ellipsis_p = false;
+ /* A valid parameter-declaration-clause can only be followed by a ')'.
+     So it's time to push all the parameters we have seen now that we
+     know we have a valid declaration.  Note that here we may not have
+     committed yet, nor should we.  Pushing here will detect the error
+     of redefining a parameter.  */
+  if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN))
+    for (tree p : pending_decls)
+      pushdecl (p);
+
    /* Finish the parameter list.  */
    if (!ellipsis_p)
      parameters = chainon (parameters, void_list_node);
@@ -24562,13 +24575,16 @@ cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause (cp_parser* 
parser,
       parameter-declaration-list , parameter-declaration
The parser flags FLAGS is used to control type-specifier parsing.
+   PENDING_DECLS is a vector of parameters that haven't been pushed yet.
Returns a representation of the parameter-declaration-list, as for
     cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause.  However, the
     `void_list_node' is never appended to the list.  */
static tree
-cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list (cp_parser* parser, cp_parser_flags flags)
+cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list (cp_parser* parser,
+                                     cp_parser_flags flags,
+                                     auto_vec<tree> *pending_decls)
  {
    tree parameters = NULL_TREE;
    tree *tail = &parameters;
@@ -24625,7 +24641,37 @@ cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list (cp_parser* 
parser, cp_parser_flags flags)
                               parameter->decl_specifiers.attributes,
                               0);
        if (DECL_NAME (decl))
-       decl = pushdecl (decl);
+       {
+         /* We cannot always pushdecl while parsing tentatively because
+            it may have side effects and we can't be sure yet if we're
+            parsing a declaration, e.g.:
+
+              S foo(int(x), int(x), int{x});
+
+            where it's not clear if we're dealing with a constructor call
+            or a function declaration until we've seen the last argument
+            which breaks it up.
+            It's safe to pushdecl so long as it doesn't result in a clash
+            with an already-pushed parameter.  But we don't delay pushing
+            different parameters to handle
+
+              S foo(int(i), decltype(i) j = 42);
+
+            which is valid.  */
+         if (pending_decls
+             && cp_parser_uncommitted_to_tentative_parse_p (parser)
+             /* See if PARAMETERS already contains a parameter with the same
+                DECL_NAME as DECL.  */
+             && [parameters, decl] {
+                  for (tree p = parameters; p; p = TREE_CHAIN (p))
+                    if (DECL_NAME (decl) == DECL_NAME (TREE_VALUE (p)))
+                      return true;
+                  return false;
+                }())
+           pending_decls->safe_push (decl);
+         else
+           decl = pushdecl (decl);
+       }
if (decl != error_mark_node)
        {
@@ -34072,7 +34118,8 @@ cp_parser_cache_defarg (cp_parser *parser, bool nsdmi)
                  cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
                  begin_scope (sk_function_parms, NULL_TREE);
                  tree t = cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list
-                           (parser, CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE);
+                           (parser, CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE,
+                            /*pending_decls*/nullptr);
                  if (t == error_mark_node)
                    error = true;
                  pop_bindings_and_leave_scope ();
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig11.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig11.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..51a586f40b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig11.C
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// PR c++/64679
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+
+struct Bar {
+  int a, b, c;
+  Bar(int a, int b, int c) : a(a), b(b), c(c) { }
+};
+
+void
+f ()
+{
+  Bar fn1(int(a), int(b), int c = sizeof(a));
+  Bar fn2(int(x), int(y), int(z)); // { dg-warning "function declaration" }
+  Bar fn3(int(x), int(y), int);
+  Bar fn4(int (*p)(int(x), int(y))); // { dg-warning "function declaration" }
+  Bar fn5(int (x), int (*p)(int(x), int(y)), int);
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  int x = 1;
+  // This ain't a decl.
+  Bar v1(int(x), int(x), int{x});
+  if (v1.a != 1 || v1.b != v1.a || v1.c != v1.a)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  Bar v2(int(x), int(x), 1);
+  if (v2.a != 1 || v2.b != v2.a || v2.c != 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  Bar v3(int(x), int(x), int(1));
+  if (v3.a != 1 || v3.b != v3.a || v3.c != 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  Bar v4(int(1), int(x), int{x});
+  if (v4.a != 1 || v4.b != 1 || v4.c != 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  Bar v5(int{x}, int(x), int{x});
+  if (v5.a != 1 || v5.b != v5.a || v5.c != v5.a)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig12.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig12.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..981f35f32a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/64679
+
+struct Bar {
+  Bar (int, int, int);
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+  Bar e1(int(x), int(x), int); // { dg-error "redefinition" }
+  Bar e2(int (*p)(int(x), int(x)), int); // { dg-error "redefinition" }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig13.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig13.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5f6a3b934c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig13.C
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// PR c++/64679
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct Bar {
+  Bar (int, int, int);
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+void
+g ()
+{
+  int x = 1;
+  Bar v1(T(x), T(x), T{x});
+  Bar v2(T(x), T(x), T(1));
+}
+
+void
+invoke (Bar (*p)) noexcept(noexcept(*p))
+{
+}
+
+auto
+pmf (int (Bar::*p)) -> decltype(p)
+{
+  return nullptr;
+}
+
+void
+f ()
+{
+  g<int>();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig14.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig14.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0305596a835
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/ambig14.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// PR c++/64679
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct F {
+  F(int, int);
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+  int x = 42;
+
+  F v1(int(x), decltype(x)(42));
+
+  F f1(int(i), decltype(i) j = 42);
+  F f2(int(i), decltype(i) j);
+  F f3(int(i), decltype(i)(j));        // { dg-warning "function declaration" }
+  F f4(int(i), decltype(i)(j) = 42); // { dg-warning "function declaration" }
+  F f5(int (i), bool b = true, decltype(i) j = 42);
+  F f6(int(i), decltype(x)(x)); // { dg-warning "function declaration" }
+}

base-commit: b06a79b82366a53fffc113f3bb5f873dbc70e381

Reply via email to