On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:40:33PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > From: Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> > > Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:59:45 +0200 > > > Hi Mikael, > > > > > Ping for the four patches starting at > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-April/057759.html : > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-April/057757.html > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-April/057760.html > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-April/057758.html > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-April/057761.html > > > > > > Richi accepted the general direction and the middle-end interaction. > > > I need a fortran frontend ack as well. > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > Thanks a lot for taking this on! This would have been a serious > > regression if released with gcc 12. > > > > Best regards > > > > Thomas > > These, or specifically r12-8227-g89ca0fffa48b79, "fortran: > Pre-evaluate string pointers. [PR102043]" have further > exposed (the issue existed before but now fails for more > platforms) PR78054 "gfortran.dg/pr70673.f90 FAILs at -O0", > at least for cris-elf and apparently also > s390x-ibm-linux-gnu. > > In the PR it is mentioned that running the test through > valgrind shows invalid accesses also on x86_64-linux-gnu. > Could it be that the test-case is invalid and has undefined > behavior? I don't know fortran so I can't tell. > > That exact commit causing a regression for s390x is somewhat > an assumption based on posted date and testresults, as the > s390x results don't include a git version. (@Stefansf: I'm > referring to > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2022-April/760060.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2022-April/760137.html > Perhaps that tester isn't using the contrib/gcc_update and > contrib/test_summary scripts, thus no LAST_UPDATED > included?)
Indeed the reports don't include a git commit id. We are using both scripts. However, since the git repository is setup differently in our case, we had been using `gcc_update --touch` only. Thus the files LAST_UPDATED as well as gcc/REVISION were not created. I changed that such that both are created, now. Thanks for letting me know! Cheers, Stefan
