On Thursday, 28 April 2022 08:09:54 CEST Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote: > libstdc++'s bits/simd.h section for PPC (Altivec) defines various > intrinsic vector types that are only available along with VSX: 64-bit > long double, double, (un)signed long long, and 64-bit (un)signed long.
Oh, so uttering `__vector double` is ill-formed (now) without VSX? I'm fairly certain I tested without VSX and the __intrinsic_type_impl definitions were fine. > experimental/simd/standard_abi_usable{,_2}.cc tests error out reporting > the unmet requirements when the target cpu doesn't enable VSX. Make the > reported instrinsic types conditional on VSX so that <experimental/simd> > can be used on ppc variants that do not have VSX support. IIRC this will break other valid uses. You'd have to run `make check-simd` (see libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/simd/README.md) to be certain nothing breaks. I will also take a look. > Regstrapped on powerpc64el-linux-gnu. Ok to install? > > This is also relevant for gcc-11. Tested with > x86_64-linux-gnu-x-ppc64-vx7r2. Ok for gcc-11? > > > for libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog > > * include/experimental/bits/simd.h [__ALTIVEC__]: Require VSX > for double, long long, and 64-bit long and 64-bit long double > intrinsic types. > --- > libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd.h | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd.h > b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd.h index > 82e9841195e1d..66c07127ec435 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd.h > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd.h > @@ -2430,17 +2430,23 @@ template <typename _Tp> > template <> > \ struct __intrinsic_type_impl<_Tp> { using type = __vector _Tp; } > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(float); > +# ifdef __VSX__ > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(double); > +# endif > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(signed char); > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(unsigned char); > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(signed short); > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(unsigned short); > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(signed int); > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(unsigned int); > +# if defined __VSX__ || __LONG_WIDTH__ == 32 > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(signed long); > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(unsigned long); > +# endif > +# ifdef __VSX__ > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(signed long long); > _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN(unsigned long long); > +# endif > #undef _GLIBCXX_SIMD_PPC_INTRIN > > template <typename _Tp, size_t _Bytes> > @@ -2452,8 +2458,9 @@ template <typename _Tp, size_t _Bytes> > static_assert(!(_S_is_ldouble && sizeof(long double) > sizeof(double)), > "no __intrinsic_type support for long double on PPC"); > #ifndef __VSX__ > - static_assert(!is_same_v<_Tp, double>, > - "no __intrinsic_type support for double on PPC w/o VSX"); > + static_assert(!(is_same_v<_Tp, double> > + || (_S_is_ldouble && sizeof(long double) == sizeof(double))), > + "no __intrinsic_type support for [long] double on PPC w/o VSX"); The missing condition here was an incorrect omission. With -mlong-double-64 and without VSX no assertion caught the issue. IIRC, a user won't get to see this error message unless there's a bug in the simd library implementation, so the error message is good enough for me. (It's talking about __intrinsic_type, the user would be lost in any case.) > #endif > using type = > typename __intrinsic_type_impl< -- ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Dr. Matthias Kretz https://mattkretz.github.io GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research https://gsi.de stdₓ::simd ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────