On 4/27/22 18:45, Marek Polacek wrote:
Here we wrongly reject the definition of "::N::a"
struct A;
namespace N { extern A a; }
struct A {} ::N::a;
because our code to diagnose a missing ; after a class definition doesn't
realize that :: can follow a class definition.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/11.4?
OK.
PR c++/90107
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.cc (cp_parser_class_specifier_1): Accept :: after a class
definition.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/parse/qualified6.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/parser.cc | 1 +
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/qualified6.C | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/qualified6.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index 169e6a62f5f..2235da10c7c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -25933,6 +25933,7 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier_1 (cp_parser* parser)
case CPP_OPEN_PAREN:
case CPP_CLOSE_PAREN:
case CPP_COMMA:
+ case CPP_SCOPE:
want_semicolon = false;
break;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/qualified6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/qualified6.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..68b51f771ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/qualified6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/90107
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+struct A;
+namespace N { extern A a; }
+struct A {} ::N::a;
+
+struct A1;
+struct B { static A1 a1; };
+struct A1 {} ::B::a1;
base-commit: 58e4a744b6e8140499ed6c33a8e9a6557e102f74