On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:19:57AM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote: > The problem here was that handle_mode_attribute clobbered the changes of any > previous attribute, only copying type qualifiers to the new type. And > common_handle_aligned_attribute had previously set up the typedef, so when > we later called set_underlying_type it saw DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE set and just > returned, even though handle_mode_attribute had messed up the TREE_TYPE. > So, let's fix handle_mode_attribute to copy attributes, alignment, and > typedefness to the new type. > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk now or after 12.1?
I think I'd slightly prefer 12.1, it doesn't seem to be a regression. > PR c/100545 > > gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: > > * c-attribs.cc (handle_mode_attribute): Copy attributes, aligned, > and typedef. > * c-common.cc (set_underlying_type): Add assert. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * c-c++-common/attr-mode-1.c: New test. > --- > gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc | 15 ++++++++++++++- > gcc/c-family/c-common.cc | 7 ++++--- > gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attr-mode-1.c | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attr-mode-1.c > > diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc > index 111a33f405a..26876d0f309 100644 > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc > @@ -2199,7 +2199,20 @@ handle_mode_attribute (tree *node, tree name, tree > args, > return NULL_TREE; > } > > - *node = build_qualified_type (typefm, TYPE_QUALS (type)); > + /* Copy any quals and attributes to the new type. */ > + *node = build_type_attribute_qual_variant (typefm, TYPE_ATTRIBUTES > (type), > + TYPE_QUALS (type)); > + if (TYPE_USER_ALIGN (type)) > + *node = build_aligned_type (*node, TYPE_ALIGN (type)); > + if (typedef_variant_p (type)) > + { > + /* Set up the typedef all over again. */ > + tree decl = TYPE_NAME (type); > + DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (decl) = NULL_TREE; > + TREE_TYPE (decl) = *node; > + set_underlying_type (decl); > + *node = TREE_TYPE (decl); > + } > } > > return NULL_TREE; > diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc > index bb0544eeaea..730faa9e87f 100644 > --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc > +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc > @@ -8153,15 +8153,16 @@ check_missing_format_attribute (tree ltype, tree > rtype) > void > set_underlying_type (tree x) > { > - if (x == error_mark_node) > + if (x == error_mark_node || TREE_TYPE (x) == error_mark_node) Maybe error_operand_p? > return; > if (DECL_IS_UNDECLARED_BUILTIN (x) && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (x)) != > ARRAY_TYPE) > { > if (TYPE_NAME (TREE_TYPE (x)) == 0) > TYPE_NAME (TREE_TYPE (x)) = x; > } > - else if (TREE_TYPE (x) != error_mark_node > - && DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (x) == NULL_TREE) > + else if (DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (x)) > + gcc_checking_assert (TYPE_NAME (TREE_TYPE (x)) == x); > + else > { > tree tt = TREE_TYPE (x); > DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (x) = tt; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attr-mode-1.c > b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attr-mode-1.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..59b20cd99e8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attr-mode-1.c > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ > +// PR c/100545 > + > +typedef int fatp_t __attribute__((aligned, mode(SI))); I think you need to add "dg-options -g", otherwise the bug doesn't manifest. Marek