On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:50:32AM +0200, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> As discussed in the PR, here is the testcase with the appropriate dg-*
> directives.
>
> Tested on arm-none-eabi with
> 1 -mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv7ve+simd
> 2 -mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7ve+simd
> 3 -mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7ve+simd
> 4 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv6s-m
> 5 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv7-m
> 6 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7e-m+fp
> 7 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7e-m+fp.dp
> 8 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv8-m.main+fp+dsp
> 9 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+fp.dp
> 10 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv8.1-m.main+mve
>
> The test is UNSUPPORTED with the first three ones (because of
> -mcpu=cortex-a7), ignored with armv6s-m, and PASSes with all the other
> ones, while it used crash without Jakub's fix (r12-8263), ie. FAIL
> with options 5,6,7,8,10. The test passed without Jakub's fix with
> option 9 because the problem happens only with an integer-only MVE.
>
> 2022-04-26 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@arm.com>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> PR tree-optimization/105374
> * gcc.target/arm/simd/pr105374.C: New.
Ok, thanks.
Jakub
