On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 March 2012 15:40, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Richard, >>> >>> ping. I think now could be a good time for applying the patch you >>> have for this issue as we are in stage 1. >> >> It will still regress the two libstdc++ testcases (well, I guess so at >> least). >> >> Jonathan - you didn't answer my reply to your question? Would it be ok >> to apply this patch with leaving the regressions in-place, to be investigated >> by libstdc++ folks? > > Sorry, I've either forgotten or missed the reply - but if you think > the problem is in libstdc++ then certainly go ahead and apply it, I'll > investigate the libstdc++ problems (and ask for help if they defeat > me!)
Ok. I'll do so after re-testing the patch. Richard.
