On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 08:01, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says > > > > > > the > > > > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > > > > > > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for > > > > > > 11.1 > > > > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > > > > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) > > > > > > > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and > > > > gcc-11. > > > > > > > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) > > > > and have now pushed r11-9881 > > > > as well. > > > > > > > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from > > > > trunk! > > > > > > Add an entry to branching.html! > > > > Like this? OK for wwwdocs? > > Maybe > > "Notify libstdc++ maintainers to update ..." > > ? > > OK with that change.
Yes, that's better. Pushed with that change, thanks.
