On Mon, 11 Apr 2022, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Previously ifcvt used to enforce that a mask A and the inverse of said mask be
> represented as ~A. So for the masks
>
> _25 = _6 != 0;
> _44 = _4 != 0;
>
> ifcvt would produce for an operation requiring the inverse of said mask
>
> _26 = ~_25;
> _43 = ~_44;
>
> but now that VN is applied to the entire function body we get a simplification
> on the mask and produce:
>
> _26 = _6 == 0;
> _43 = _4 == 0;
>
> This in itself is not a problem semantically speaking (though it does create
> more masks that need to be tracked) but when vectorizing the masked
> conditional
> we would still detect _26 and _43 to be inverses of _25 and _44 and mark them
> as requiring their operands be swapped.
>
> When vectorizing we swap the operands but don't find the BIT_NOT_EXPR to
> remove
> and so we leave the condition as is which produces invalid code:
>
> ------>vectorizing statement: _ifc__41 = _43 ? 0 : _ifc__40;
> created new init_stmt: vect_cst__136 = { 0, ... }
> add new stmt: _137 = mask__43.26_135 & loop_mask_111
> note: add new stmt: vect__ifc__41.27_138 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_137,
> vect__ifc__40.25_133, vect_cst__136>;
>
> This fixes disabling the inversion detection code when the loop isn't masked
> since both conditional would be external. We'd then not use the new cond_code
> and would incorrectly still swap the operands.
>
> The resulting code is also better than GCC-11 with most operations now
> predicated on the loop mask rather than a ptrue.
>
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
>
> Ok for master?
LGTM.
Thansk,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/105197
> * tree-vect-stmts.cc (vectorizable_condition): Prevent cond swap when
> not masked.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/105197
> * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-2.c: New test.
>
> --- inline copy of patch --
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e33532d8bed5f90f216817a6692544eae1f3ae3f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* { dg-do run { target aarch64_sve_hw } } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-O -ftree-vectorize" } */
> +
> +unsigned char arr_7[9][3];
> +unsigned char (*main_arr_7)[3] = arr_7;
> +int main() {
> + char arr_2[9];
> + int arr_6[9];
> + int x;
> + unsigned i;
> + for (i = 0; i < 9; ++i) {
> + arr_2[i] = 21;
> + arr_6[i] = 6;
> + }
> + for (i = arr_2[8] - 21; i < 2; i++)
> + x = arr_6[i] ? (main_arr_7[8][i] ? main_arr_7[8][i] : 8) :
> (char)arr_6[i];
> + if (x != 8)
> + __builtin_abort ();
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-2.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5eec5cd837d786390c441fc5ddd2f93c1374d3a4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr105197-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-O -ftree-vectorize" } */
> +
> +void f(int n, int y, char *arr_2, char *arr_6) {
> + for (int i = y; i < n; i++)
> + arr_6[i] = arr_6[i] ? (arr_2[i] ? 3 : 8) : 1;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tand\tp[0-9]+.b} } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> index
> 5c9e8cfefa5032d39a11696b06cff9ae50f4d46a..a680f991e07f7b147d1fa64e9464d0f7ed0d843f
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> @@ -10493,7 +10493,7 @@ vectorizable_condition (vec_info *vinfo,
> bool honor_nans = HONOR_NANS (TREE_TYPE (cond.op0));
> tree_code orig_code = cond.code;
> cond.code = invert_tree_comparison (cond.code, honor_nans);
> - if (loop_vinfo->scalar_cond_masked_set.contains (cond))
> + if (!masked && loop_vinfo->scalar_cond_masked_set.contains (cond))
> {
> masks = &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo);
> cond_code = cond.code;
>
>
>
--
Richard Biener <[email protected]>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
