On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> But it seems like the magic incantation to detect “real” built-in
> function calls is getting longer and longer. Can we not abstract this
> in a single place rather than have to repeat the same long sequence in
> multiple places?
I've already committed it, so it can be only dealt with an incremental
patch.
One possibility is to do it inside of
gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p, after the assert do that:
if (DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS (fndecl) == BUILT_IN_NORMAL)
if (tree decl = builtin_decl_explicit (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (fndecl)))
fndecl = decl;
but we then lose the theoretical possibility of comparing against the
actual user declaration. Though I guess in the
gimple-fold.cc
gimple-low.cc
gimple-match-head.cc
calls to that function we also want this rather than what they do currently.
Jakub
