On 24/03/2022 13:03, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/24/22 11:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Maybe we could add the file path into the gcov information stream using a new tag:

#define GCOV_TAG_GCDA_FILE_NAME  ((gcov_unsigned_t)0xa5000000)

Then the complete gcov information can be dumped using a single base64 encoded stream. We could add some support to the gcov-tool to read this stream and merge it into gcda files.

I would support such patch!

Ok, good. I work currently on a prototype implementation. My use case would be like this.

Run a test executable which dumps all gcov info objects in a serial data stream. It could be encoded as base64. It could be also compressed. On the host you unpack the encoded data stream and feed it into gcov-tool using the new "merge-stream" subcommand:

gcov-tool --help
Usage: gcov-tool [OPTION]... SUB_COMMAND [OPTION]...

Offline tool to handle gcda counts

  -h, --help                            Print this help, then exit
  -v, --version                         Print version number, then exit
merge-stream [options] [stream-file] Merge coverage stream file (or stdin)
                                        and coverage file contents
    -v, --verbose                       Verbose mode
    -w, --weight <w1,w2>                Set weights (float point values)

Example:

base64 -d log.txt | gcov-tool merge-stream

The gcov-tool uses a new tag which contains the filename of the associated gcov info file:

gcov-dump b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda
b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda:data:magic `gcda':version `B20 '
b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda:stamp 3496756572
b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda:checksum 137326246
b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda: a5000000: 62:FILENAME `/home/EB/sebastian_h/src/lwip/b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda' b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda: a1000000: 8:OBJECT_SUMMARY runs=0, sum_max=0 b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda: 01000000: 12:FUNCTION ident=1016818396, lineno_checksum=0xd31791e7, cfg_checksum=0x4529789a
b-xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu/init.gcda:    01a10000: 232:COUNTERS arcs 29 counts

Should I generate this filename tag to all configurations or just in case inhibit_libc is defined?

Advantage:

* No dependency on the GCC configuration

Disadvantages:

* Bigger files
* Actual filename and the filename of the tag differ if file is moved
* Potential information leak

In any case, I would add the support for the (optional) filename tag to all readers.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/

Reply via email to