We found .x in the anonymous struct, but then didn't find .y there; we
should decide that means we're done with the struct rather than that the
code is wrong.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
PR c++/101767
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc (reshape_init_class): Back out of anon struct
if a designator doesn't match.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/ext/anon-struct10.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/decl.cc | 5 +++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/anon-struct10.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/anon-struct10.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 8afda8264c4..375385e0013 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -6626,6 +6626,11 @@ reshape_init_class (tree type, reshape_iter *d, bool
first_initializer_p,
return error_mark_node;
}
+ if (!field && ANON_AGGR_TYPE_P (type))
+ /* Apparently the designator isn't for a member of this anonymous
+ struct, so head back to the enclosing class. */
+ break;
+
if (!field || TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL)
{
if (complain & tf_error)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/anon-struct10.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/anon-struct10.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9b01bf3fada
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/anon-struct10.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// PR c++/101767
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-pedantic" }
+
+typedef struct {
+ struct {
+ int x;
+ };
+ union {
+ int y;
+ float z;
+ };
+} S;
+
+void foo(void)
+{
+ [[maybe_unused]] S a = {
+ .x = 1,
+ .y = 0
+ };
+}
base-commit: 70b8f43695b0e6fabc760d247ac83f354092b21d
--
2.27.0
