This is Christophe Lyon's fix to PR c/98198, an ICE-on-invalid-code regression affecting mainline, and a suitable testcase. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap and make -k check with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
2022-03-16 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@arm.com> Roger Sayle <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com> gcc/c-family/ChangeLog PR c/98198 * c-attribs.cc (decl_or_type_attrs): Add error_mark_node check. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog PR c/98198 * gcc.dg/pr98198.c: New test case. Thanks in advance, Roger --
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc index c885d88..111a33f 100644 --- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.cc @@ -806,6 +806,8 @@ decl_or_type_attrs (tree node) return attrs; tree type = TREE_TYPE (node); + if (type == error_mark_node) + return NULL_TREE; return TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type); } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr98198.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr98198.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..489afae --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr98198.c @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +static inline void sub_1 ( ) { + struct struct_1 var_9 , var_10 +} + +static int var_9[1] __attribute__ ( ( section ( ".data" ) ) ) ; +/* { dg-excess-errors "" } */