On 3/4/22 8:14 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 3/4/22 11:33 AM, Peter Bergner wrote: >>> Ok pushed to trunk. I haven't determined yet whether we need this on GCC >>> 11 yet. >>> I'll check on that and report back. Thanks! >> >> I've confirmed that GCC 11 fails the same way and that the backported patch >> fixes the issue there too. Ok for GCC 11 assuming my full regression testing >> is clean? >> >> GCC 10 has the same checking code, so it looks to need the backport as well. >> I'll go ahead and backport and regression test it there too. > > The backports to GCC 11 and GCC 10 bootstrapped and regtested with no > regressions. > Ok for the GCC 11 and GCC 10 release branches after a day or two of baking on > trunk?
Ping. The trunk patch has been confirmed to fix the glibc build errors and no issues with the patch has surfaced, so ok for the GCC11 and GCC10 release branches? Peter