On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 09:34:10PM +0800, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> LGTM, thanks for handling this.

Thanks, committed.

> > Note, while the Intrinsics guide for _mm_loadu_si32 says SSE2,
> > for _mm_loadu_si16 it says strangely SSE.  But the intrinsics
> > returns __m128i, which is only defined in emmintrin.h, and
> > _mm_set_epi16 is also only SSE2 and later in emmintrin.h.
> > Even clang defines it in emmintrin.h and ends up with inlining
> > failure when calling _mm_loadu_si16 from sse,no-sse2 function.
> > So, isn't that a bug in the intrinsic guide instead?
> I think it's a bug, it's supposed to generate movzx + movd, and movd
> is under sse2, and have reported it to the colleague who maintains
> Intel intrinsic guide.
> 
> Similar bug for
> _mm_loadu_si64
> _mm_storeu_si16
> _mm_storeu_si64

Currently it emits pxor + pinsrw, but even those are SSE2 instructions,
unless they use a MMX register (then it is MMX and SSE).
I agree that movzwl + movd seems better than pxor + pinsrw though.
So, do we want to help it a little bit then?  Like:

2022-03-14  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * config/i386/eemintrin.h (_mm_loadu_si16): Use _mm_set_epi32 instead
        of _mm_set_epi16 and zero extend the memory load.

        * gcc.target/i386/pr95483-1.c: Use -msse2 instead of -msse in
        dg-options, allow movzwl+movd instead of pxor with pinsrw.

--- gcc/config/i386/emmintrin.h.jj      2022-03-14 10:44:29.402617685 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/emmintrin.h 2022-03-14 11:58:18.062666257 +0100
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ _mm_loadu_si32 (void const *__P)
 extern __inline __m128i __attribute__((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, 
__artificial__))
 _mm_loadu_si16 (void const *__P)
 {
-  return _mm_set_epi16 (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (*(__m16_u *)__P)[0]);
+  return _mm_set_epi32 (0, 0, 0, (unsigned short) ((*(__m16_u *)__P)[0]));
 }
 
 extern __inline void __attribute__((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, 
__artificial__))
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95483-1.c.jj        2020-10-14 
22:05:19.380856952 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95483-1.c   2022-03-14 12:11:07.716891710 
+0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "pxor\[ 
\\t\]+\[^\n\]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\]*%xmm\[0-9\]+(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "pinsrw\[ 
\\t\]+\[^\n\]*%xmm\[0-9\]+(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?:movzwl\[ \\t\]+\[^\n\]*|pxor\[ 
\\t\]+\[^\n\]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\]*%xmm\[0-9\]+)(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?:movd|pinsrw)\[ 
\\t\]+\[^\n\]*%xmm\[0-9\]+(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "pextrw\[ 
\\t\]+\[^\n\]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\]*(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
 
 


        Jakub

Reply via email to