On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 15:17 +0800, xucheng...@loongson.cn wrote:

> The binutils has been merged into trunk:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=560b3fe208255ae909b4b1c88ba9c28b09043307
> 
> Note: We split -mabi= into -mabi=lp64d/f/s, the new options not support by 
> upstream binutils yet,
> this GCC port requires the following patch applied to binutils to build.
> https://github.com/loongson/binutils-gdb/commit/aacb0bf860f02aa5a7dcb76dd0e392bf871c7586
> (will be submitted to upstream after gcc side comfirmed)

I think you don't need a review for binutils change here.  You should
get it reviewed and applied in binutils-gdb ASAP.  Then in install.texi
you would add a note like "loongarch64-*-* requires binutils >= 2.39" in
"Target specific installation notes", as an unpatched 2.38 does not
work.

And based on the history of RISC-V port
(https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2017-January/222595.html) the process
for a new port seems:

1. Get a permission from the Steering Committee.
2. Add one or two port maintainers into MAINTAINERS file.
3. Now the technical reviewing of the patch series just begin.


I'm not an expert in software engineering (or social interaction :) and
I don't know if the process has been changed in these years.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

Reply via email to