On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 15:24, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:40:49AM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote: > > The C++ committee just updated the values of these macros to reflect some > > late C++20 papers that we implement but others don't yet; see PR103891. > > > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk. > > So, shouldn't we update project/cxx-status.html for that change? > > Like following? > > diff --git a/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html b/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html > index 014fed8b..4bbff256 100644 > --- a/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html > +++ b/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html > @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ > <td rowspan=12> Concepts </td> > <td><a href="https://wg21.link/p0734r0";>P0734R0</a></td> > <td class="supported" rowspan=11> <a > href="../gcc-10/changes.html#cxx">10</a> </td> > - <td rowspan=12> __cpp_concepts >= 201907 </td> > + <td rowspan=12> __cpp_concepts >= 202002 </td>
I don't like this change. The value to check for P0734R0 support is still 201907. If you want to also check for P0848R3 support, you can use 202002. So I think it would be better to move the P0848R3 row out of the rowspan group, and then put 202002 as the macro for that paper. > </tr> > <tr> > <td><a href="https://wg21.link/p0857r0";>P0857R0</a></td> > @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ > <tr> > <td><a href="https://wg21.link/p1330r0";>P1330R0</a></td> > <td class="supported center"> <a > href="../gcc-9/changes.html#cxx">9</a> </td> > - <td> </td> > + <td> __cpp_constexpr >= 202002 </td> > </tr> > <tr> > <template><!-- preserve CSS nth-child ordering --></template> This one looks fine.
