On 2/4/22 12:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote: >>> If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring >>> GCC, use the long double default from the host compiler. >> >> That doesn't make any sense. The host compiler can be any random >> compiler completely unrelated to the target. > > Yes, see <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Portability.html>. [snip] > I already NAKed this patch for weeks, and I do it again now.
Did you NAK the patch due to its specific implementation or are you even against the aim of the patch, namely that gcc configure tries to determine the long double default of the underlying system and matches that? Peter
