On 04/02/2022 09:46, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Abid, are you going to address these? I think it does make sense if the > C/C++ and Fortran test cases match as much as feasible. > Sure. I will do that.
> However: really (a) remove 'omp_alloctrait (omp_atk_pool_size, 8192)' > altogether, or instead: (b) increase its size (if that can be computed) > -- and/or (c) limit the number of OpenMP threads executing in parallel? > Due to unfamiliarity with all that, I don't know what's best here. > C testcase also does not have the pool_size trait. So it makes sense to me to not have it in fortran testcase too. It also seems more cleaner than putting some limits on number of threads or increasing the size which will be a bit fragile. Thanks, -- Hafiz Abid Qadeer
