Here we're crashing during satisfaction of the lambda's placeholder type
constraints because the constraints depend on the template arguments
from the enclosing scope, which aren't a part of the lambda's
DECL_TI_ARGS.  So when inside a lambda, do_auto_deduction needs to add
the "regenerating" template arguments to the set of outer template
arguments, like we already do in satisfy_declaration_constraints.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk and perhaps 11?

        PR c++/103706

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * constraint.cc (satisfy_declaration_constraints): Use
        lambda_regenerating_args instead.
        * cp-tree.h (lambda_regenerating_args): Declare.
        * pt.cc (add_to_template_args): Handle NULL_TREE extra_args
        gracefully.
        (lambda_regenerating_args): Define, split out from
        satisfy_declaration_constraints.
        (do_auto_deduction): Use lambda_regenerating_args to obtain the
        full set of outer template arguments when checking the
        constraint on a placeholder type within a lambda.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda18.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/constraint.cc                          |  9 +----
 gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                              |  1 +
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                                  | 37 ++++++++++++++++---
 .../g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda18.C          | 14 +++++++
 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda18.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index cc4df4216ef..c41ee02b910 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
@@ -3148,18 +3148,13 @@ satisfy_declaration_constraints (tree t, sat_info info)
        args = add_outermost_template_args (args, inh_ctor_targs);
     }
 
-  if (regenerated_lambda_fn_p (t))
+  if (LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P (t))
     {
       /* The TI_ARGS of a regenerated lambda contains only the innermost
         set of template arguments.  Augment this with the outer template
         arguments that were used to regenerate the lambda.  */
       gcc_assert (!args || TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) == 1);
-      tree lambda = CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (DECL_CONTEXT (t));
-      tree outer_args = TI_ARGS (LAMBDA_EXPR_REGEN_INFO (lambda));
-      if (args)
-       args = add_to_template_args (outer_args, args);
-      else
-       args = outer_args;
+      args = add_to_template_args (lambda_regenerating_args (t), args);
     }
 
   /* If any arguments depend on template parameters, we can't
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index b9eb71fbc3a..7a7fe5ba599 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -7715,6 +7715,7 @@ extern void finish_lambda_scope                   (void);
 extern tree start_lambda_function              (tree fn, tree lambda_expr);
 extern void finish_lambda_function             (tree body);
 extern bool regenerated_lambda_fn_p            (tree);
+extern tree lambda_regenerating_args           (tree);
 extern tree most_general_lambda                        (tree);
 extern tree finish_omp_target                  (location_t, tree, tree, bool);
 extern void finish_omp_target_clauses          (location_t, tree, tree *);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 6e129da1d05..c919d2de68f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -573,6 +573,9 @@ add_to_template_args (tree args, tree extra_args)
   if (args == NULL_TREE || extra_args == error_mark_node)
     return extra_args;
 
+  if (extra_args == NULL_TREE)
+    return args;
+
   extra_depth = TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (extra_args);
   new_args = make_tree_vec (TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) + extra_depth);
 
@@ -14442,6 +14445,21 @@ most_general_lambda (tree t)
   return t;
 }
 
+/* Return the set of template arguments used to regenerate the lambda T
+   from its most general lambda.  */
+
+tree
+lambda_regenerating_args (tree t)
+{
+  if (LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P (t))
+    t = CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (DECL_CONTEXT (t));
+  gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (t) == LAMBDA_EXPR);
+  if (tree ti = LAMBDA_EXPR_REGEN_INFO (t))
+    return TI_ARGS (ti);
+  else
+    return NULL_TREE;
+}
+
 /* We're instantiating a variable from template function TCTX.  Return the
    corresponding current enclosing scope.  We can match them up using
    DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION because lambdas only ever have one source location, and
@@ -30100,12 +30118,19 @@ do_auto_deduction (tree type, tree init, tree 
auto_node,
            return type;
        }
 
-      if ((context == adc_return_type
-          || context == adc_variable_type
-          || context == adc_decomp_type)
-         && current_function_decl
-         && DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (current_function_decl))
-       outer_targs = DECL_TI_ARGS (current_function_decl);
+      if (context == adc_return_type
+         || context == adc_variable_type
+         || context == adc_decomp_type)
+       if (tree fn = current_function_decl)
+         if (DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (fn) || LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P (fn))
+           {
+             outer_targs
+               = DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (fn) ? DECL_TI_ARGS (fn) : NULL_TREE;
+             if (LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P (fn))
+               /* As in satisfy_declaration_constraints.  */
+               outer_targs = add_to_template_args (lambda_regenerating_args 
(fn),
+                                                   outer_targs);
+           }
 
       tree full_targs = add_to_template_args (outer_targs, targs);
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda18.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda18.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0e883c2039d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda18.C
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/103706
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T, class U> concept C = __is_same(T, int) && __is_same(U, int);
+
+template<class T> void f() {
+  []() -> C<T> auto {
+    C<T> auto x = T(); // { dg-error "constraints" }
+    return T(); // { dg-error "constraints" }
+  }();
+}
+
+template void f<int>(); // { dg-bogus "" }
+template void f<char>(); // { dg-message "required from here" }
-- 
2.35.0

Reply via email to