Hi Tobias,

I don't know why that bootstrapped initially. I fixed the patch (naming a
```
else 
  /* Prevent warning.  */
  cdesc = NULL_TREE;
```
obvious) and rerun bootstrap making sure to purge everything beforehand. It did
not break bootstrap on x86_64-linux/f35. Hope it doesn't elsewhere with submit
26e237fb5b8.

Thanks for pointing this out.

Regards,
        Andre

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:36:23 +0100
Andre Vehreschild via Fortran <fort...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Tobias,
> 
> ups, sorry, reverted immediately.
> 
> Regards,
>       Andre
> 
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:27:26 +0100
> Tobias Burnus <tob...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Andre,
> > 
> > your patch breaks bootstrapping:
> > 
> > ../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc: In function ‘tree_node*
> > structure_alloc_comps(gfc_symbol*, tree, tree, int, int, int,
> > gfc_co_subroutines_args*)’:
> > ../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc:9200:42: error: ‘cdesc’ may be
> > used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] 9200 |
> > gfc_conv_descriptor_data_set (&tmpblock, cdesc, comp); |
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../../repos/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc:9082:16: note: ‘cdesc’ was
> > declared here 9082 |           tree cdesc; |                ^~~~~ cc1plus:
> > all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [Makefile:1143:
> > fortran/trans-array.o] Error 1
> > 
> > Tobias
> > 
> > On 28.01.22 10:07, Andre Vehreschild via Fortran wrote:  
> > > Hi Harald,
> > >
> > > thanks for the fast review. I have submitted as c9c48ab7bad.
> > >
> > > Will wait for two weeks (reminder set :-)) before backporting to gcc-11.
> > >
> > > Thank you and regards,
> > >       Andre
> > >
> > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:30:22 +0100
> > > Harald Anlauf via Fortran <fort...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >    
> > >> Hi Andre',
> > >>
> > >> Am 25.01.22 um 17:32 schrieb Andre Vehreschild via Fortran:    
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> attached patch fixes wrong code generation when broadcasting a derived
> > >>> type containing allocatable and non-allocatable scalars. Furthermore
> > >>> does it prevent broadcasting of coarray-tokens, which are always local
> > >>> this_image. Thus having them on a different image makes no sense.
> > >>>
> > >>> Bootstrapped and regtested ok on x86_64-linux/F35.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ok, for trunk and backport to 12 and 11-branch after decent time?
> > >>>
> > >>> I perceived that 12 is closed for this kind of bugfix, therefore asking
> > >>> ok for 13.    
> > >> I do not think that 12 is closed for bugfixing, especially not for
> > >> fortran.  And if my cursory reading of the patch is not misleading,
> > >> the impact of the patch is really limited to coarrays.
> > >>
> > >> You may want to wait for another 1-2 days for additional comments.
> > >> If not, it is OK from my side.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the patch!
> > >>
> > >> Harald
> > >>    
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>     Andre
> > >>> --
> > >>> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de    
> > >>    
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de    
> > -----------------
> > Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201,
> > 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer:
> > Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München;
> > Registergericht München, HRB 106955  
> 
> 


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 

Reply via email to