OK. Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 14:58 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The testcase from the PR got fixed with r12-3119-g675a3e40567e1d
> and looks quite similar to the evrp-trans.c test, except evrp-trans.c
> is tested on signed integer types.
> I think it would be useful to test it for unsigned comparisons too.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux (-m32/-m64), ok for trunk?
>
> 2022-01-19 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> PR c/104115
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/evrp-trans2.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/evrp-trans2.c.jj 2022-01-19
> 14:54:31.195317913 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/evrp-trans2.c 2022-01-19
> 14:54:52.964019002 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-evrp" } */
> +
> +#define int unsigned
> +#include "evrp-trans.c"
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "kill" "evrp" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "keep" 13 "evrp"} } */
>
> Jakub
>
>
