On 1/18/22 05:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!

The following testcase is miscompiled.  We see the constructor is immediate,
in build_over_call we trigger:
           if (obj_arg && is_dummy_object (obj_arg))
             {
               call = build_cplus_new (DECL_CONTEXT (fndecl), call, complain);
               obj_arg = NULL_TREE;
             }
which makes call a TARGET_EXPR with the dtor in TARGET_EXPR_CLEANUP,
but then call cxx_constant_value on it.  In cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr
it triggers the:
       else if (TREE_CODE (t) != CONSTRUCTOR)
         {
           r = get_target_expr_sfinae (r, tf_warning_or_error | tf_no_cleanup);
           TREE_CONSTANT (r) = true;
         }
which wraps the CONSTRUCTOR r into a new TARGET_EXPR, but one without
dtors (I think we need e.g. the TREE_CONSTANT for the callers),
and finally build_over_call uses that.

Looks like you added the tf_no_cleanup in r10-3661 (constexpr new). Maybe that should only be added if TARGET_EXPR_CLEANUP (t) is null?

The following patch fixes that by reusing the earlier TARGET_EXPR and
overwriting TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL in it; I think the TARGET_EXPR_SLOT can't
appear in the TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL, because the CONSTRUCTOR has been built
already before get_target_expr_sfinae has been called and addresses of
an automatic var aren't constant expression.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2022-01-18  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/104055
        * call.c (build_over_call): If in a call to consteval ctor call
        is a TARGET_EXPR with cleanups and cxx_constant_value returns
        a different TARGET_EXPR, reuse the original TARGET_EXPR with
        the new TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL.

        * g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval27.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/call.c.jj    2022-01-11 23:11:22.049294946 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/call.c       2022-01-17 11:48:50.272044412 +0100
@@ -9935,7 +9935,14 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *can
                    obj_arg = TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0);
                }
            }
-         call = cxx_constant_value (call, obj_arg);
+         tree cst_call = cxx_constant_value (call, obj_arg);
+         if (call != cst_call
+             && TREE_CODE (call) == TARGET_EXPR
+             && TARGET_EXPR_CLEANUP (call)
+             && TREE_CODE (cst_call) == TARGET_EXPR)
+           TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (call) = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (cst_call);
+         else
+           call = cst_call;
          if (obj_arg && !error_operand_p (call))
            call = build2 (INIT_EXPR, void_type_node, obj_arg, call);
          call = convert_from_reference (call);
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval27.C.jj 2022-01-17 11:54:09.656459199 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval27.C    2022-01-17 11:54:37.035068677 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// PR c++/104055
+// { dg-do run { target c++20 } }
+
+int g;
+
+struct A {
+  ~A () { if (a != 17 || b != 26) __builtin_abort (); g = 42; }
+  consteval A () : a (17), b (26) {}
+  int a, b;
+};
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  A{};
+  if (g != 42)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}

        Jakub


Reply via email to