In the patch for PR92385 I added asserts to see if we tried to make a
vec_init of a vec_init, but didn't see any in regression testing.  This
testcase is one case, which seems reasonable: we create a VEC_INIT_EXPR for
the aggregate initializer, and then again to express the actual
initialization of the member.  We already do similar collapsing of
TARGET_EXPR.  So let's just remove the asserts.

        PR c++/103946

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * init.c (build_vec_init): Remove assert.
        * tree.c (build_vec_init_expr): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-array1.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/init.c                             | 5 +----
 gcc/cp/tree.c                             | 5 +----
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-array1.C | 6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-array1.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c
index 6226812b470..ccc4f5ece08 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/init.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.c
@@ -4369,10 +4369,7 @@ build_vec_init (tree base, tree maxindex, tree init,
     init = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (init);
 
   if (init && TREE_CODE (init) == VEC_INIT_EXPR)
-    {
-      gcc_checking_assert (false);
-      init = VEC_INIT_EXPR_INIT (init);
-    }
+    init = VEC_INIT_EXPR_INIT (init);
 
   bool direct_init = false;
   if (from_array && init && BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (init)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.c b/gcc/cp/tree.c
index 4c1135ba386..d0c6490e42f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/tree.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/tree.c
@@ -787,10 +787,7 @@ tree
 build_vec_init_expr (tree type, tree init, tsubst_flags_t complain)
 {
   if (init && TREE_CODE (init) == VEC_INIT_EXPR)
-    {
-      gcc_checking_assert (false);
-      return init;
-    }
+    return init;
 
   tree elt_init;
   if (init && TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-array1.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-array1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1ab14359b56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-array1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// PR c++/103946
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct s1 {  s1(); };
+class s2 { s1 f1[2]{}; };
+s2 a;

base-commit: 75047f795111150fd10a8f86f5c72deab10cde77
-- 
2.27.0

Reply via email to