On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:53:25PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > @@ -3215,6 +3215,14 @@ check_tokens (const token_t *tokens, unsigned 
> > > ntoks,
> > >                     plural = "s";
> > >                   }
> > > +       /* As an exception, don't warn about "decl-specifier*" since
> > > +          it's a C++ grammar production.  */
> > > +       {
> > > +         const size_t l = strlen ("decl-specifier");
> > > +         if (!strncmp (format_chars, "decl-specifier", l))
> > > +           return format_chars + l - 1;
> > > +       }
> > 
> > I'd prefer to avoid repeating the string literal, but OK.
> 
> We have the startswith inline function that allows to avoid the repetition.
> It wouldn't work in the above case due to the return format_chars + l - 1,
> but that in itself looks quite weird to me, I'd think better would be
> continue; instead of the return ...;, i.e. whenever we see decl-specifier
> in the text pretend we haven't seen decl.
> So
>             /* As an exception, don't warn about "decl-specifier*" since
>                it's a C++ grammar production.  */
>             if (startswith (format_chars, "decl-specifier"))
>               continue;
> ?
> Or perhaps even optimize and don't compare uselessly everything with
> "decl-specifier" and do it only for the "decl" badword if it matches,
> so
>             if (badwords[i].name[0] == 'd'
>                 && startswith (format_chars, "decl-specifier"))
>               continue;
> ?

Works for me, thanks.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

Can I backport it to GCC 11 too?

-- >8 --
I'm tired of seeing

cp/parser.c:15923:55: warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 
'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]
cp/parser.c:15925:57: warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 
'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]

every time I compile cp/parser.c, which happens...a lot.  I'd like my
compilation to be free of warnings, otherwise I'm going to miss some
important ones.

"decl-specifiers" is a C++ grammar term; it is not actual code, so
should not be wrapped with %< %>.  I hope we can accept it as an exception
in check_tokens.

It was surrounded by %< %> in cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq, so fix that.

In passing, fix a misspelling in missspellings.

        PR c++/103758

gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:

        * c-format.c (check_tokens): Accept "decl-specifier*".

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Replace %<decl-specifier%>
        with %qD.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C: Adjust dg-error.
---
 gcc/c-family/c-format.c                          | 8 +++++++-
 gcc/cp/parser.c                                  | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-format.c b/gcc/c-family/c-format.c
index 7d3b3117ee2..afa77810a5c 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-format.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-format.c
@@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ check_tokens (const token_t *tokens, unsigned ntoks,
                           wlen, format_chars);
   else
     {
-      /* Diagnose some common missspellings.  */
+      /* Diagnose some common misspellings.  */
       for (unsigned i = 0; i != sizeof badwords / sizeof *badwords; ++i)
        {
          unsigned badwlen = strspn (badwords[i].name, " -");
@@ -3215,6 +3215,12 @@ check_tokens (const token_t *tokens, unsigned ntoks,
                  plural = "s";
                }
 
+             /* As an exception, don't warn about "decl-specifier*" since
+                it's a C++ grammar production.  */
+             if (badwords[i].name[0] == 'd'
+                 && startswith (format_chars, "decl-specifier"))
+               continue;
+
              format_warning_substr (format_string_loc, format_string_cst,
                                     fmtchrpos, fmtchrpos + badwords[i].len,
                                     opt,
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 4475f792916..6b91a0ce491 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -15821,7 +15821,7 @@ cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq (cp_parser* parser,
       if (found_decl_spec
          && (flags & CP_PARSER_FLAGS_ONLY_TYPE_OR_CONSTEXPR)
          && token->keyword != RID_CONSTEXPR)
-       error ("%<decl-specifier%> invalid in condition");
+       error ("%qD invalid in condition", ridpointers[token->keyword]);
 
       if (found_decl_spec
          && (flags & CP_PARSER_FLAGS_ONLY_MUTABLE_OR_CONSTEXPR)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C
index 733d494c4d7..e81acba68ae 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C
@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@ constexpr int something() { return 3; }
 
 int main() {
   if (constexpr long v = something()) {}
-  if (static long v = something()) { } // { dg-error "'decl-specifier' 
invalid" }
+  if (static long v = something()) { } // { dg-error "'static' invalid" }
 }

base-commit: 1096ab1775636f35de9c6661f8f71f03299af998
-- 
2.33.1

Reply via email to