Could you be more specific? I tried the equivalent of:
/* int [50] foobar = {1,2,3,4};
int [50] foo() { int arr[50];
arr = (int [50]){-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6};
arr = foobar;
arr = (int [50]){1,2,3,4,5,6};
arr[6] = 1234;
return arr;}
N.B: Not a typo, returning an array.
*/
in test-local-init-rvalue.c with a global and local "arr" and it ran fine. (See
attachment).
Regards, Petter
Från: Antoni Boucher <boua...@zoho.com>
Skickat: den 29 december 2021 23:45
Till: Petter Tomner; David Malcolm; j...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Ämne: Re: [commited] jit: Support for global rvalue initialization and
constructors
I realized that trying to do an assignment to an array created by the
new array constructor API will result in a "gimplification failed"
error:
libgccjit.so: error: gimplification failed
0x7fa3a441e5d3 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool
(*)(tree_node*), int)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:15964
0x7fa3a442b1ab gimplify_modify_expr
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:5975
0x7fa3a441ac4c gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool
(*)(tree_node*), int)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:14951
0x7fa3a441e63c gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:7026
0x7fa3a441bca3 gimplify_statement_list
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:2014
0x7fa3a441bca3 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool
(*)(tree_node*), int)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:15396
0x7fa3a441e63c gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:7026
0x7fa3a441f000 gimplify_bind_expr
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:1427
0x7fa3a441adc6 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool
(*)(tree_node*), int)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:15152
0x7fa3a441e63c gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:7026
0x7fa3a4420671 gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:16197
0x7fa3a4420b3c gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*)
../../../gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:16351
0x7fa3a419fe5e gcc::jit::playback::function::postprocess()
../../../gcc/gcc/jit/jit-playback.c:1909
0x7fa3a41a13dc gcc::jit::playback::context::replay()
../../../gcc/gcc/jit/jit-playback.c:3250
Should an assignment to such a value be supported?
Le mercredi 15 décembre 2021 à 19:19 +0000, Petter Tomner a écrit :
> Oh ye I accidentally dropped that in the merge thank you.
>
> I believe there is an implicit "global:" in the top of each version
> scope, so it shouldn't
> matter other than looking a bit deviant.
>
> Regards,
> Petter
>
> Från: Antoni Boucher <boua...@zoho.com>
> Skickat: den 15 december 2021 15:19
> Till: Petter Tomner; David Malcolm; j...@gcc.gnu.org;
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Ämne: Re: [commited] jit: Support for global rvalue initialization
> and constructors
>
> Hi Petter.
> I believe you have forgotten the line `global:` in the file
> `gcc/jit/libgccjit.map`.
> I'm not sure what this line does, but it is there for all other ABI.
> David: What do you think?
> Regards.
>
> Le mardi 14 décembre 2021 à 17:22 +0000, Petter Tomner via Jit a
> écrit :
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have pushed the patch for rvalue initialization and ctors for
> > libgccjit, for ABI 19.
> >
> > Please see attached patch.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Petter
> >
>
>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-local-init-rvalue.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-local-init-rvalue.c
index 1d74679c07c..308f5c39538 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-local-init-rvalue.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-local-init-rvalue.c
@@ -456,12 +456,42 @@ create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
0,
gcc_jit_lvalue_as_rvalue(local));
}
- { /* int[50] foo() { int arr[50];
+ { /* int [50] foobar = {1,2,3,4};
+ int[50] foo() { int arr[50];
+ arr = (int [50]){-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-6};
+ arr = foobar;
arr = (int [50]){1,2,3,4,5,6};
+ arr[6] = 1234;
return arr;}
N.B: Not a typo, returning an array.
*/
+
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *rval_1 = gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (
+ ctxt, int_type, 1);
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *rval_2 = gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (
+ ctxt, int_type, 2);
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *rval_3 = gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (
+ ctxt, int_type, 3);
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *rval_4 = gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (
+ ctxt, int_type, 4);
+
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *values4[] = {rval_1, rval_2, rval_3, rval_4};
+
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *ctor3 =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_array_constructor (ctxt,
+ 0,
+ int50arr_type,
+ 4,
+ values4);
+ gcc_jit_lvalue *global_intarr_1234 =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_global (ctxt, NULL,
+ GCC_JIT_GLOBAL_EXPORTED,
+ int50arr_type,
+ "foobar");
+
+ gcc_jit_global_set_initializer_rvalue (global_intarr_1234, ctor3);
+
gcc_jit_function *fn =
gcc_jit_context_new_function (ctxt,
0,
@@ -471,11 +501,19 @@ create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
0,
0,
0);
+
gcc_jit_lvalue *local =
gcc_jit_function_new_local (fn,
0,
int50arr_type,
"local");
+ /*
+ gcc_jit_lvalue *local =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_global (ctxt,
+ 0, GCC_JIT_GLOBAL_EXPORTED,
+ int50arr_type,
+ "local");
+ */
gcc_jit_block *block = gcc_jit_function_new_block (fn, "start");
gcc_jit_rvalue *values[6];
@@ -490,8 +528,37 @@ create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
6,
values);
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *values2[6];
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++)
+ values2[i] = gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (ctxt, int_type, -i - 1);
+
+ gcc_jit_rvalue *ctor2 = gcc_jit_context_new_array_constructor (
+ ctxt,
+ 0,
+ int50arr_type,
+ 6,
+ values2);
+
+ gcc_jit_block_add_assignment (
+ block, 0, local,
+ gcc_jit_lvalue_as_rvalue (global_intarr_1234));
+ gcc_jit_block_add_assignment (block, 0, local, ctor2);
gcc_jit_block_add_assignment (block, 0, local, ctor);
+ gcc_jit_lvalue *arr_access =
+ gcc_jit_context_new_array_access (ctxt, 0,
+ gcc_jit_lvalue_as_rvalue (local),
+ gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (
+ ctxt,
+ int_type,
+ 6));
+ gcc_jit_block_add_assignment (block, 0, arr_access,
+ gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (
+ ctxt,
+ int_type,
+ 1234));
+
gcc_jit_block_end_with_return (block,
0,
gcc_jit_lvalue_as_rvalue(local));
@@ -696,7 +763,7 @@ verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
struct int50arr (*fn) (void) =
gcc_jit_result_get_code (result, "fn_int50arr_123s");
struct int50arr ans = fn ();
- int key[50] = {1,2,3,4,5,6};
+ int key[50] = {1,2,3,4,5,6, 1234};
CHECK_VALUE (memcmp (ans.arr, key, sizeof (key)), 0);
}
