Hi, On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c scan-tree-dump-times original "return > \\(char\\) > -\\(unsigned char\\) c & 31;" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c scan-tree-dump-times original "return > \\(int\\) > \\(12 - \\(unsigned int\\) d\\) & 7;" 1 > > because we dump the unsigned type variant differently now. What do > people think - adjust the testcase? Adjust how we pretty-print > these non-standard integer types? Adjusting the pretty printer would be nice anyway. Those <unnamed>:35 thingies hurt my eyes. Just printing int17 or uint18 would be perfectly fine, with special casing of sizes that match the normal C types for the target in question (so that input 'unsigned char' isn't converted to 'uint8' on one and 'uint16' on another target). Ciao, Michael.
