On 12/14/21 17:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here during constraint checking for the recursive call to 'f',
substitution into the PARM_DECL 'd' in the atomic constraint gives us
the wrong local specialization because local_specializations at this
point contains entities associated with the _outer_ call to 'f'.
This patch fixes this by calling push_to_top_level during constraint
checking, which'll clear local_specializations for us.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk/11? Also tested on cmcstl2 and range-v3.
OK.
PR c++/103714
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constraint.cc (satisfy_declaration_constraints): Do
push_to_top_level and pop_from_top_level around the call to
satisfy_normalized_constraints.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/constraint.cc | 4 ++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index 566f4e38fac..9b0348dfdd6 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
@@ -3186,9 +3186,11 @@ satisfy_declaration_constraints (tree t, sat_info info)
{
if (!push_tinst_level (t))
return result;
+ push_to_top_level ();
push_access_scope (t);
result = satisfy_normalized_constraints (norm, args, info);
pop_access_scope (t);
+ pop_from_top_level ();
pop_tinst_level ();
}
@@ -3244,9 +3246,11 @@ satisfy_declaration_constraints (tree t, tree args, sat_info info)
if (!push_tinst_level (t, args))
return result;
tree pattern = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (t);
+ push_to_top_level ();
push_access_scope (pattern);
result = satisfy_normalized_constraints (norm, args, info);
pop_access_scope (pattern);
+ pop_from_top_level ();
pop_tinst_level ();
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a315a59b828
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/103714
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<int I>
+struct A {
+ static const int i = I;
+
+ template<int J>
+ void f(A<J> d = {}) requires (d.i != i) {
+ f<I>(); // { dg-error "no match" }
+ }
+};
+
+int main() {
+ A<0> a;
+ a.f<1>();
+}