Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> On 12/12/21 3:13 AM, Andrea Monaco via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> 
>> Hello.
>> 
>> 
>> I propose to make that message more verbose.  It sure would have helped
>> me once.  You don't always have a Web search available :)
>
> Warnings turned into errors have the [-Werror=...] tag at the end
> so I'm not sure I see when reiterating -Werror at the end of output
> would be helpful.  Can you explain the circumstances when it would
> have helped you?

Printing -Werror=foo might give the impression that that was the option
that was actually passed.  The message is the same if -Werror=foo was
passed and if -Werror was passed (or something in between, for groups
of options).

The final “all warnings being treated as errors” line is only printed
for -Werror, not -Werror=foo, so I think including -Werror there makes
sense, and is more consistent with the individual error messages.

So personally I think we should take the patch.

Thanks,
Richard

> For what it's worth, a change here that I think might be more useful
> is printing the number of diagnostics of each kind (e.g., 2 warnings
> and 5 errors found).
>
>> Andrea Monaco
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic.c b/gcc/diagnostic.c
>> index 4ded1760705..8b67662390e 100644
>> --- a/gcc/diagnostic.c
>> +++ b/gcc/diagnostic.c
>> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ default_diagnostic_final_cb (diagnostic_context *context)
>>         /* -Werror was given.  */
>>         if (context->warning_as_error_requested)
>>          pp_verbatim (context->printer,
>> -                    _("%s: all warnings being treated as errors"),
>> +                    _("%s: all warnings being treated as errors (-Werror; 
>> disable with -Wno-error)"),
>
> If this change should move forward, -Werror needs to be quoted
> (e.g., passed as an argument to %qs or surrounded in a pair of
> %< and %> directives).  The "disable with -Wno-error" part
> is superfluous and would not be entirely accurate for warnings
> promoted to errors by #pragma GCC diagnostic (those cannot be
> demoted back to warnings by -Wno-error).
>
> Martin
>
>>                       progname);
>>         /* At least one -Werror= was given.  */
>>         else
>> 

Reply via email to