On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:48 AM Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> PR103624 observes that we get segfaults for the 64-bit darn builtins when
> compiled
> on a 32-bit architecture. The old built-in infrastructure requires
> TARGET_64BIT, and
> this was missed in the new support. Moving these two builtins from the
> [power9]
> stanza to the [power9-64] stanza solves the problem.
>
> Tested the fix on a powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu cross. Bootstrapped and tested
> on
> powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is this okay for trunk?
Okay.
Thanks, David
>
> Thanks!
> Bill
>
>
> 2021-12-13 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/
> PR target/103624
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def (__builtin_darn): Move to
> [power9-64] stanza.
> (__builtin_darn_raw): Likewise.
> ---
> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
> b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
> index 30556e5c7f2..2becd96a36c 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
> @@ -2799,15 +2799,9 @@
>
> ; Miscellaneous P9 functions
> [power9]
> - signed long long __builtin_darn ();
> - DARN darn {}
> -
> signed int __builtin_darn_32 ();
> DARN_32 darn_32 {}
>
> - signed long long __builtin_darn_raw ();
> - DARN_RAW darn_raw {}
> -
> const signed int __builtin_dtstsfi_eq_dd (const int<6>, _Decimal64);
> TSTSFI_EQ_DD dfptstsfi_eq_dd {}
>
> @@ -2840,6 +2834,12 @@
> void __builtin_altivec_stxvl (vsc, void *, long);
> STXVL stxvl {}
>
> + signed long long __builtin_darn ();
> + DARN darn {}
> +
> + signed long long __builtin_darn_raw ();
> + DARN_RAW darn_raw {}
> +
> const signed int __builtin_scalar_byte_in_set (signed int, signed long
> long);
> CMPEQB cmpeqb {}
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
