Hi Joseph, Thanks for the detailed review and explanations.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:54:53PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > However, it's better to get things right automatically without needing any > macros or other header additions at all. That is, define feclearexcept as > a built-in function, *without* the extra arguments, and with the back end > knowing about the FE_* values for the target libc. Then you can simply > avoid expanding the function inline when the back end doesn't know both > the FE_* values and how to use them. I took this part to heart, I agree that an approach in molds of the v5 sounds more like it, something that will "just works" or fallback gracefully. And who knew, with your insight I think I find just the thing, I am finishing a v7 and I hope it address the previews consernings and sidestep all this complications with the v6 aproach. o/ Raoni
