Hi!

Paul Clarke pointed out to me that I had wrongly used a compile-time check
instead of a run-time check in this executable test.  This patch fixes
that.  I also fixed a typo in a string that caught my eye.

Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu, committed as obvious.

Thanks!
Bill


2021-11-23  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/testsuite/
        * gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c: Change effective target to
        a run-time check.  Fix a typo in a debug print statement.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c
index 28c2b91988e..f1f960c51c7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c99 -mcpu=power9" } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
 #include <stdio.h>
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ int main ()
   if (mffs_val.ll != mffsl_val.ll)
     {
 #ifdef DEBUG
-      printf("ERROR, __builtin_mffsl() returned 0x%llx, not the expecected 
value 0x%llx\n",
+      printf("ERROR, __builtin_mffsl() returned 0x%llx, not the expected value 
0x%llx\n",
             mffsl_val.ll, mffs_val.ll);
 #else
       abort();
-- 
2.25.1


Reply via email to