Hi! Paul Clarke pointed out to me that I had wrongly used a compile-time check instead of a run-time check in this executable test. This patch fixes that. I also fixed a typo in a string that caught my eye.
Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu, committed as obvious. Thanks! Bill 2021-11-23 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.ibm.com> gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c: Change effective target to a run-time check. Fix a typo in a debug print statement. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c index 28c2b91988e..f1f960c51c7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/test_mffsl.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c99 -mcpu=power9" } */ -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */ #ifdef DEBUG #include <stdio.h> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ int main () if (mffs_val.ll != mffsl_val.ll) { #ifdef DEBUG - printf("ERROR, __builtin_mffsl() returned 0x%llx, not the expecected value 0x%llx\n", + printf("ERROR, __builtin_mffsl() returned 0x%llx, not the expected value 0x%llx\n", mffsl_val.ll, mffs_val.ll); #else abort(); -- 2.25.1