— Jojo
在 2021年11月19日 +0800 AM12:13,Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com>,写道:
>
>
> On 11/16/2021 7:20 PM, Jojo R via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > — Jojo
> > 在 2021年11月16日 +0800 PM8:12,Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com>,写道:
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:45 PM Jojo R via Gcc-patches
> > > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > > > Skip renaming if instruction is noop move, and it will
> > > > been removed for performance.
> > > Is there any (target specific) testcase you can add? Such commits are
> > > problematic
> > > when later bisected to since the intent isn't clear.
> > I made a issue in bugzilla, please check it, thanks.
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103296
> So what Richi is asking is can you construct a testcase for the
> testsuite?  Having a BZ is helpful because we can reference it in the
> commit message, but a test, even if it's target specific, is even better
> from a long term maintenance standpoint.
>
I found this issue from the ISA extension vector of risc-v target, and
It has not been upstream by now, normal test case without vector isa
Is difficult to construct for this patch, but I think it’s simple and useful for
other ISAs or targets, or recommit this patch after our risc-v Vector ISA
Is ready on master branch ?

Any suggestions ?
> Jeff

Reply via email to