— Jojo 在 2021年11月19日 +0800 AM12:13,Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com>,写道: > > > On 11/16/2021 7:20 PM, Jojo R via Gcc-patches wrote: > > — Jojo > > 在 2021年11月16日 +0800 PM8:12,Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com>,写道: > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:45 PM Jojo R via Gcc-patches > > > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > Skip renaming if instruction is noop move, and it will > > > > been removed for performance. > > > Is there any (target specific) testcase you can add? Such commits are > > > problematic > > > when later bisected to since the intent isn't clear. > > I made a issue in bugzilla, please check it, thanks. > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103296 > So what Richi is asking is can you construct a testcase for the > testsuite? Having a BZ is helpful because we can reference it in the > commit message, but a test, even if it's target specific, is even better > from a long term maintenance standpoint. > I found this issue from the ISA extension vector of risc-v target, and It has not been upstream by now, normal test case without vector isa Is difficult to construct for this patch, but I think it’s simple and useful for other ISAs or targets, or recommit this patch after our risc-v Vector ISA Is ready on master branch ?
Any suggestions ? > Jeff