Re: [PATCH 1/3] nptl: Extract from pthread_cond_common.c

[Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches]

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 05:27:42PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> +      /* S3.  See __condvar_load_64_relaxed.  */

Shouldn't that be See __atomic_wide_counter_load_relaxed ?

> +  if (((l >> 31) > 0) && ((h >> 31) > 0))

Any reason not to write it as (int) l < 0 && (int) h < 0?
Yes, the compiler will likely optimize it that way (probably
even as (int) (l & h) < 0, but still...

        Jakub