On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:09:15PM -0800, Mike Stump via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches 
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Nitpicking time.  It's spelled "ones' complement" rather than "one's
> > complement".  I didn't go into config/.
> > 
> > Ok for trunk?
> 
> So, is it two's complement or twos' complement then?  Seems like it should be 
> the same, but  wikipedia suggests it is two's complement, as does google.  If 
> that is wrong, you should go edit it as well.  :-)
 
It is "two's complement":
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584543.html
but Knuth also continues to say that there's "twos' complement notation",
which "has radix 3 and complementation with respect to (2...22)_3."


It's not lost on me how inconsequential this patch is; I'm happy to just
drop it and let the copy editor in me sleep.

Marek

Reply via email to