> Looks OK to me except for: > >> - for (; i > 0; i--) >> + for (; i > 0;) > > Might as well just make that a while loop.
Indeed! Committed with a while loop, thanks for the review! FX
> Looks OK to me except for: > >> - for (; i > 0; i--) >> + for (; i > 0;) > > Might as well just make that a while loop.
Indeed! Committed with a while loop, thanks for the review! FX