On Wed, 10 Nov 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Cumulative update of the OpenMP 5.x changes in GCC 12.
Wow - quite a bit!
> For the last bullet: the implementation-status documentation is new –
> but even if it were not, linking to it makes sense. I kept adding and
> removing a 'full' after the "The", which sounds better but while the
> list in libgomp.texi is extensive, it does not have "full" coverage of
> all changes. Additionally, as it is new, a "now" could be added after
> "can".
gcc-12/changes.html: Update OpenMP status
and the <code>affinity</code> clause are now supported and for Fortran
additionally the following features which were available in C and C++
- before: <code>depobj</code>, <code>mutexinoutset</code> and
How about something like: "...supported. In addition Fortran gained...",
breaking up the long sentence?
+ <code>loop</code> directive and combined directives involving
+ <code>master</code> directive have been added.</li>
...involving the <code>master</code> directive
^^^
+ <li>The following OpenMP 5.1 feature have been added: support for
expressing
...features... (plural)
+ variable, the <code>reproducible</code> and <code>unconstrained</code>
+ modifiers to the <code>order</code> clause, and, for C/C++ only, the
+ align- and allocate-modifiers to the <code>allocate</code> clause and
<code>...</code> for align and allocate?
+ features and the <code>OMP_NUM_TEAMS</code> and
+ <code>OMP_TEAMS_THREAD_LIMIT</code> environement variables and their
+ associated API routines are now supported as well as the
memory-allocation
+ routines added for Fortran and extended for C/C++ in OpenMP 5.1.
How about "...features. Finally..." or "...features. In addition..." to
break this long beast?
+ Fortran code, strictly-structured blocks can be used.</li>
Is there really a dash in "strictly structured"?
Hope this helps (and Jakub already approved, so please just consider
those additional suggestions).
Gerald
