Quoting Segher Boessenkool (2021-11-09 11:19:58)
> Hi!
> 
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:39:46AM -0300, Lucas A. M. Magalhaes wrote:
> > Ping.
> 
> I did not get the original, and neither did the archives?
> 
Strange, it's on the archives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582643.html
Looking at my local mails, I did't receive it as well.

> > Historically this was added to fill gaps from ld.so.cache on early AT
> > releases. This now are just causing errors and rework. Since AT5.0 the
> > AT's ld.so is using a correctly configured ld.so.cache and sets the
> > DT_INTERP to AT's ld.so. This two factors are sufficient for an AT
> > builded program to get the correct libraries.
> > 
> > GCC congured with --with-advance-toolchain has issues building GlibC
> > releases because it adds DT_RUNPATH to ld.so and that's unsupported.
> > 
> > 2021-03-11  Lucas A. M. Magalhães  <l...@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> 2021-11-03
> 
> >       * config.gcc (powerpc*-*-*): Remove -rpath from
> >         --with-advance-toochain
> 
> The start of the line aligns with the star.  Changelog lines end in a
> full stop.  It's "toolchain".
> 
> The patch is okay for trunk.  Thanks!  Do you need backports as well?
> Those are fine as well :-)
I don't think we need a backport.
Segher can you push this with the changes or should I send a V2?

---
Lucas A. M. Magalhães

Reply via email to