Quoting Segher Boessenkool (2021-11-09 11:19:58) > Hi! > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:39:46AM -0300, Lucas A. M. Magalhaes wrote: > > Ping. > > I did not get the original, and neither did the archives? > Strange, it's on the archives. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582643.html Looking at my local mails, I did't receive it as well.
> > Historically this was added to fill gaps from ld.so.cache on early AT > > releases. This now are just causing errors and rework. Since AT5.0 the > > AT's ld.so is using a correctly configured ld.so.cache and sets the > > DT_INTERP to AT's ld.so. This two factors are sufficient for an AT > > builded program to get the correct libraries. > > > > GCC congured with --with-advance-toolchain has issues building GlibC > > releases because it adds DT_RUNPATH to ld.so and that's unsupported. > > > > 2021-03-11 Lucas A. M. Magalhães <l...@linux.ibm.com> > > 2021-11-03 > > > * config.gcc (powerpc*-*-*): Remove -rpath from > > --with-advance-toochain > > The start of the line aligns with the star. Changelog lines end in a > full stop. It's "toolchain". > > The patch is okay for trunk. Thanks! Do you need backports as well? > Those are fine as well :-) I don't think we need a backport. Segher can you push this with the changes or should I send a V2? --- Lucas A. M. Magalhães