On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 11:21 PM Roger Sayle <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote: > > > I wonder if reviewers could take a look (or a second look) at some of my > outstanding patches. > > Four nvptx backend patches: > > nvptx: Use cvt to perform sign-extension of truncation. > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578256.html > > nvptx: Add (experimental) support for HFmode with -misa=sm_53 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579623.html > > nvptx: Adds uses of -misa=sm_75 and -misa=sm_80 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579691.html > > Transition nvptx backend to STORE_FLAG_VALUE = 1 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/581004.html > > Two middle-end patches: > > Simplify paradoxical subreg extensions of TRUNCATE > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/578848.html > > PR middle-end/100810: Penalize IV candidates with undefined value bases > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578441.html
I did comment on this one, noting the more general issue. My opinion is still that doing heavy lifting in IVOPTs is misplaced. > And a gfortran patch: > > gfortran: Improve translation of POPPAR intrinsic > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/548055.html > > > Many thanks in advance, > Roger > -- > >
