On 11/4/21 14:09, Richard Biener wrote:
But we shouldn't start with the current global options but with ones we saved for optimize attribute/pragma processing, no?
We hit the issue when we combine cmdline and pragma optimize options.
Problem of -gtoggle is that it does not directly influence an option, but it negates it. That said, I think my patch with gtoggle_used is a reasonable workaround.Well, then we could as well unset flag_gtoggle after processing it, no?
Yeah, that work! :) Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests. Ready to be installed? Thanks, Martin
From b458389805f3d0677b04850d95990a88df40806f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:28:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Reset when -gtoggle is used in gcc_options. PR debug/102955 gcc/ChangeLog: * opts.c (finish_options): Reset flag_gtoggle when it is used. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/pr102955.C: New test. --- gcc/opts.c | 1 + gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr102955.C | 14 ++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr102955.C diff --git a/gcc/opts.c b/gcc/opts.c index 3f80fce82bc..442e6597b63 100644 --- a/gcc/opts.c +++ b/gcc/opts.c @@ -1377,6 +1377,7 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct gcc_options *opts_set, if (flag_gtoggle) { + flag_gtoggle = false; if (debug_info_level == DINFO_LEVEL_NONE) { debug_info_level = DINFO_LEVEL_NORMAL; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr102955.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr102955.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..de9689edec4 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr102955.C @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +/* PR debug/102955 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-g -gtoggle" } */ + +#pragma GCC optimize "0" +struct j +{ + explicit j (); + ~j (); +}; +void g (void) +{ + new j(); +} -- 2.33.1