@Segher: PING
On 10/19/21 16:43, Martin Liška wrote:
On 10/19/21 16:23, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:24:32PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 10/14/21 17:10, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
Looks like you got your parentheses wrong here.
Whoops, thanks for the heads up.
I'm testing this fixed version.
Please start a new thread for every new patch (series). I missed this
one like this, instead I reviewed the older one.
Is it really best practice. My impression is that patch review (iterating over
a patch) happens in the same thread (in most cases). It's caused by discussion
in between sender reviewers.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-rs6000-Remove-unnecessary-option-manipulation.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Encoding: base64, Size: 2.6K --]
Meh :) If I need a reply to somebody's questions, I always attach patch as an
attachment.
And I can't likely influence how Thunderbird is going to mark it.
Don't encode as non-text. Don't use x-anything if you can help it, it
is meaningless in email.
Use git send-email, it makes everything work :-)
I know.
Anyway, sending updated version of the patch.
Cheers,
Martin
Segher
