On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:57:05 -0600 Jeff Law via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> I thought our "counting" based tests could only check equality (ie, > expect to see this string precisely N times). Though if we could check > that # threads realized was > some low water mark, that'd probably be > better than what we've got right now. That's what i was about to suggest yesterday but didn't dare, with a reference to testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp # proc object-size for the cmp.
