Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk, and branches after a while?
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/ranges (join_view::__iter_cat::_S_iter_cat): Adjust criteria for returning bidirectional_iterator_tag as per LWG3535. (join_view::_Iterator::_S_iter_concept): Likewise. --- libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges index 273699aa790..c1519c7dbd5 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges @@ -2523,7 +2523,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor using _OuterCat = typename iterator_traits<_Outer_iter>::iterator_category; using _InnerCat = typename iterator_traits<_Inner_iter>::iterator_category; if constexpr (derived_from<_OuterCat, bidirectional_iterator_tag> - && derived_from<_InnerCat, bidirectional_iterator_tag>) + && derived_from<_InnerCat, bidirectional_iterator_tag> + && common_range<range_reference_t<_Base<_Const>>>) return bidirectional_iterator_tag{}; else if constexpr (derived_from<_OuterCat, forward_iterator_tag> && derived_from<_InnerCat, forward_iterator_tag>) @@ -2575,7 +2576,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor { if constexpr (_S_ref_is_glvalue && bidirectional_range<_Base> - && bidirectional_range<range_reference_t<_Base>>) + && bidirectional_range<range_reference_t<_Base>> + && common_range<range_reference_t<_Base>>) return bidirectional_iterator_tag{}; else if constexpr (_S_ref_is_glvalue && forward_range<_Base> -- 2.33.1.711.g9d530dc002